Thursday, December 30, 2010

Sure-footed Single Mom !

I am not sure if wearing a worn-out jean and cotton gurtha on top is kind of fashion for all young human-right activists. (Older women wear cotton saree). I never know Arudhati Roy and Medha Patkar can be fashion icons too. That’s how she was dressed and talking to a man sitting on a wheel-chair.

I was sitting on the steps of the Town-Hall Bangalore holding a chart written, "Free Binayak Sen" in a rally organized by People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL).


She has a very attractive smile... to be precise a confident smile!
She was holding a chart in one hand and holding a young girl maybe 4 years old in other hand and shouting “Binayak Sen vidudalae maadi”

After the protest got over by 7 pm, I was walking towards my car in the parking area. I saw her standing in front of my car and whirling the shawl around her neck. Kid was sitting on front bonnet of my car. I approached my car and stood near the car so that she can complete what she was doing.

Kid was asking the question, “Mommy! why people were holding different flags? It’s not our National flag”. The lady smiled and before answering it, she turned back looked at me said, “Sorry! It’s your car?”

“Yep. Its ok”, I replied and started answering kid's question, “people from different organization had come to participate and they were carrying their organization’s flag”

She intervened and said, “Yeah. That’s correct”, facing her child and then turned towards me, “It’s very unfortunate that people want to politicize everything. It could have been avoided”

I said, “At least I am happy that from people from all communities and sections have come forward to register their protest”

“That’s true. But it also had some religious groups which were talking more against the BJP government than actual issue itself. I believe we should seriously fight against religion too...Oh sorry! If I offended you”

You too don’t believe god. Thats nice!

“No issues. I too don’t believe in God either”

“I am not an atheist. You can call me Pantheist”

“Oh... sexed up Atheist huh?”

She smiled and continued, “You belong to that Richard Dawkin's gang huh?”

“Haha! Yes”

By this time the kid was just getting curious to know what’s that we were talking and she was trying to get the attention of her mom.

“Science can only be a guiding factor and cannot be a deciding factor. We can’t do everything our gene says. For instance government cannot take a policy based on science alone. Moreover science cannot answer all our questions”

“I agree with you! Science has told us little, but science is a quest. It will explore and expand more. Even if we know little from science, that’s all we have and we have to depend only on it for anymore questions”

Finally the kid got her mom's attention. Kid was asking, “Mummy we will go to grandma's house”

She was talking kanada to her kid. I believe she explained something to her why she can’t take her to grandma's house.

“Having a kid and attending these kind of events is very difficult”

“Yeah! You could have left her home or with her dad”

“I am a single-mom”, she said with a pass out smile.

Did I hear that? Single-Mom?

“Oh…I am sorry”

“What is there to be sorry about it? I have chosen it myself. Before my love resulted in a marriage, I decided not to go for it and settled with a kid", she said pampering her child.

Oh! This girl is born without marriage. Shut-up...don’t ask such questions to her

She continued, “After all women expects Respect and Freedom. If marriage doesn’t guarantee that, then what’s the point? Particularly in India marriages make woman suffer”

“Hmmm...I can understand your frustration. I too agree that binding two people in the name of marriage for life is too much. But as an institution marriage is fairly successful for years and I don’t know what could be the alternative”

“Maybe...”, after a pause looking away she said, “I was not eligible for it”

I was silent for a moment. Don’t know really what to say.
Life is not fair to everyone...how such a woman is allowed to suffer...maybe that’s what makes her different from others

Breaking the silence I said, “Maybe our society needs more time to understand it”

“It’s not about time. We are one of the oldest civilizations in the world. If time is the factor, we should have grown in every sense by this time. There is something fundamentally wrong with our system and culture. Unfortunately we haven't really tried to change it for long”

Yes. She has a point. Why we haven’t changed for so long? What’s special about our culture? Really we haven’t progressed in many ways.

She continued, “Now by looking at other countries and scientific developments we started learning. That is also being held back by right-wing extremists in the name Nationalism. Their lowest common denominator is Religion"

“Yes. In the name of nationalism they deny free speech. Anyone who talks against the State were called anti-nationals or seditionist”

“Exactly! If this can happen for Binayak, I don’t know how many innocents are suffering in jail. As Arundati Roy says this is not democracy, it’s 'Demon-Crazy'”

Now the little girl lost her patience and started screaming to her mom to take her home. The lady said something in kanada to her daughter and lifted her from my car.

“She is not going to stop till I take her home. Sorry I have to go! Nice meeting you”

“It was pleasure meeting you! Have a wonderful evening”

“You too... Bye!". She started walking away carrying her kid.

She made it impossible for me not to look her again.

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Objection my Lord!!!

In recent times our Judicial System/Judges seems to be very active in giving ‘Statements’ and Judgments. Particularly there were many judgments/proceedings this year which will have wider impacts. Ayodhya verdict, 2G scam, CVC appointment, Live-in relationship, same-sex marriages…

Equivocally I too agree that Judiciary should play an important role in a country and its one of the pillars of democracy. But it doesn’t mean that judges are empowered to comment or give judgments beyond what they are expected to do.



For instance take Ayodhya verdict by Allahabad High-Court. The court/judges should only act only on the evidences and facts. But in this case judges have taken the faith of the people into consideration rather than evidence. Maybe first time in history of Indian judicial system it had happened. Almost all judges have agreed that below the centre dome of Babri masjid is where Lord Ram was born. How can judges be so sure about it without any evidence? How can they conclude only with the belief of the Hindus?
If it’s just an entitlement issue of the disputed land, only Sunni waqf-board has some documents to claim that land. How that land can be divided based on faith?

Similarly the same Apex court has asked to consider some alternate route for Sethu Samutharam project even after NASA confirmed that the chain of small islets connecting India and Sri Lanka are real geographical features that have been mapped for centuries. Chains of islands form a variety of natural geological processes and their occurrence is not evidence of any human activity.

In this year Supreme-Court asked the Central Government to distribute free food grains to families below the poverty line (BPL). For which Manmohan Singh categorically said, "I respectfully submit that the Supreme Court should not go into the realm of policy formulation"
I am wondering how court can decide on government policies? Maybe court can question why those food grains have not been stored safely. How it can ask the government to distribute it freely.

Think of the recent 2G scam issue. How judges can decide what should be the policy of 2G auction? If they say first-come-first-serve or selling the spectrum at the 2001 rate in 2007 is wrong, how they can decide it? All they can probe is if all the process has been followed or not for the spectrum allocation. I don’t know how they can really question the 'intent' of any decision of the government.

Recently it questioned the Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) chief PJ Thomas ‘Integrity’ and appointment. Anyone charged with an offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty. Why can’t this apply to PJ Thomas? How it can question the government on his appointment? Does Supreme Court want to decide all appointments made by government?

If judiciary wants to cleanup the failures of government, it should first cleanup its own house.
After having overwhelming evidence against then Karnataka High-Court judge P D Dinakaran, they were not able to impeach him. All they were able to do is just transfer him as Chief-Justice of Sikkim high-court.

Only recently Justice Soumitra Sen got impeached for his corruption. Despite being indicted many times for corruption, the judge has comfortably managed to exploit the loopholes in the system. Excluding allowances and perks for fuel, attendants, house rent, phone and medical bills, Justice Sen's salary today stands at Rs. 80,000 per month. They also say that Sen has not done any work for the last four years but drawn full salary and perks. Is it a paid holiday for him? Why tax payer’s money was spent on him? Does it mean judges are above the law?
On contrary judges are worried about people in BPL.

Courts being too powerful and going out of their way to make statements and judgments are not good for democracy. After all it’s run by few individuals. They are not accountable for anyone. In democracy Parliament and Legislative-Assemblies are the highest body of policy making. If it has been approved by parliament, I don’t think court should interfere in it. That too courts taking a decision based on faith is extremely dangerous.

If courts/judges are running this country, it means its being run by few un-accountable individuals which is NOT good for democracy.